![]() |
|
|||||||
| Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Obviously not. They whine that it's not big and fat enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Come on, cat.
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
|
Quote:
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
still eats dirt
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
|
"Fuck you America! Where's my check?"
Try, "Fuck you, America! Your economy is worth 10 trillion, you spend billions each year to wage war to kill hundreds of thousands of people, but when millions of lives are in danger you spend only a fraction of that." As a country we are, and always have been, much more interested in destroying than preserving. And that goes for more than humanity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,486
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
still eats dirt
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,031
|
To be fair though, it's not like we have to give anyone anything.
You are correct, we do not have to give anyone anything. We don't have to go out of our way to save anyone but ourselves. But we do it and we do it often. And we spend more to wage war to do it than we could without the loss of life. The problem is that we're constantly taking away in the name of giving and when we puff up our chest and declare ourselves the police of the world, the world expects us to step in when others are in trouble. The problem here is that with all of the resources at our disposal, we seem much more intent on spending more money to kill than to save. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
ok, let's start from scratch here. bush is evil, incompetent, and maybe incontinant as well. tw is the presidential advisor.
What would have been an appropriate response to the Tsunami's? Run it by the numbers. what do you do in the 1st hour? 1st day? 2nd day? etc. i want details, not "i would do more..." what dollar amount would be satisfactory? do we send in our military? oh and keep in mind that we can't actually dispurse any funds until the foreign power officially requests assistance through the embassies.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Uh, hand me the red flag. Now stand back.
TW, we have to wait for aid requests. We just can't barge into soverign nations.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Not only is India providing aid to its own people. India is also providing aid to Sri Lanka. Its been 5 days. If dispatched a day after the disaster, the USS Kitty Hawk and its task force would already be there. Where are they? C5A and C17s would be landing for at least the second time with badly needed food, medicines, etc. This need not even come from the US government. The NGOs need that transportation desperately. Five days later we finally realize that something like 5 million people (including many of our own people) are in desperate need of help. Why? Because the international community shamed George Jr into paying attention to what has happened. Again look at the satellite photographs that George Jr has access to last Sunday. Then you tell me why he did not realize the scope of this disaster: Asia's Deadly Waves . Click on the first row "Photos: Impact" . Click on the second row "Before and After". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||||
|
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
do you realize that parts of thailand (phuket, patong) that we are seeing in news clips had people sitting on the beach sucking down margaritas the very next morning? if we had just immediately put planes in the air, they might not have taken supplies to the most appropriate locations. GWB screws up enough that there is plenty to pick on, but to turn every stinking event in the world into a bush bash is just downright pathetic. what happened to you tw? did someone with a shiny new MBA kick sand in your face or steal your girlfriend once? why the blind hatred?
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Its quite likely that the final number is not as high as 5 million. It may only be 2 million. But don't worry. Lookout123 says tourists still have their margaritas. Sound like George Jr reasoning to me. I guess those satellite pictures don't mean anything if margaritas are available. No wonder religious extremists always make bad leaders. Margaritas prove that people are not at risk. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
changed his status to single
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
|
Quote:
and back to the red cross and NGO aid flowing in... do you seriously not understand that government regulations require that even after funds and support had been pledged, formal requests had to be made from the governments in need before the US government could do anything? the red cross and other NGO's can go and do as they please - they are after all Non-Governmental Organizations. international politics has a set of rules that are to be followed. We gripe when they aren't followed, we can't rightly gripe when they are.
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|