|  | 
| 
 | |||||||
| Image of the Day Images that will blow your mind - every day. [Blog] [RSS] [XML] | 
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Rating:   | Display Modes | 
|  | 
|  01-13-2006, 11:20 AM | #1 | 
| The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 
					Posts: 71,105
				 | 
			
			Oow, thank you, thank you, 3foot!     Film and photo paper....good ammo.    
				__________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. | 
|   |   | 
|  01-13-2006, 11:59 AM | #2 | 
| still eats dirt Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Tampa, FL 
					Posts: 3,031
				 | |
|   |   | 
|  01-13-2006, 01:44 PM | #3 | |
| ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA 
					Posts: 27,717
				 | Quote: 
 Now if they would just make a digital SLR that would take my old manual focus Nikon lenses. The Nikon D50 looks promising, but the exposure won't work with my old lenses. I hate having several hundred dollars worth of optics just sitting on the shelf in my closet. Come on Nikon! | |
|   |   | 
|  01-13-2006, 10:39 PM | #4 | 
| The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 
					Posts: 71,105
				 | 
			
			I'm with you there. Many $k in Nikkor lenses gathering dust. For me it wasn’t the film but the difficulty and inconvenience of developing and QUALITY printing. Of course it’s hard to beat the convenience of resizing and emailing without having to write a literate letter to accompany them.   
				__________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. | 
|   |   | 
|  01-16-2006, 11:12 PM | #5 | |
| Recruit or Something Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Alabama 
					Posts: 4
				 | Quote: 
 However, the D200 is much more expensive that the D50 ($1700 vs. ~$600), so unless you have lots of money invested in lenses, it's not really worth it to get a D200 just for this feature. | |
|   |   | 
|  | 
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| 
 | 
 |