Sexual history doesn't matter? Who would marry a porn star?

[morethanpretty]

Originally Posted by 9th Engineer

Unfortunately the issue at hand in this thread would be BMW's ranting, he started the damn thing after all...

I tried to read from the beginning but it started turning foul on the first page. If its all just bmw's rant, then why are so many cellarites paying attention? I say that we all are more intelligent then to be involved in such a pointless petty squabble. Trading insult after insult is really immature and it somewhat dissapoints me that we are so easily captured by bmw's hostile posts. By being so responsive to his posts, we are only encouraging him. For example my brother and I used to have burping contests and when my sis got mad/cried we were only encouraged to burp more, louder and longer. Unfortunatly it has been a long time since my bro and I have had the chance to engage in a serious contest, and I think that I have lost my touch.
That said...
Let me address the question bmw originally psted then:
I would not marry a porn star who is currently working as such, but if they have since left that job, no longer lead a promiscuous life, and respect sex as a demonstration of equal parts emotional love, and physical passion then I would consider them. Of course I would have to find other similarties and love them as a person before I would want to dedicate my love to them. But being a former porn star in of itself is not enough to cause me to disregard them as a partner.

Originally Posted by morethanpretty

I tried to read from the beginning but it started turning foul on the first page. If its all just bmw's rant, then why are so many cellarites paying attention? I say that we all are more intelligent then to be involved in such a pointless petty squabble. Trading insult after insult is really immature and it somewhat dissapoints me that we are so easily captured by bmw's hostile posts. By being so responsive to his posts, we are only encouraging him. For example my brother and I used to have burping contests and when my sis got mad/cried we were only encouraged to burp more, louder and longer. Unfortunatly it has been a long time since my bro and I have had the chance to engage in a serious contest, and I think that I have lost my touch.
That said...
Let me address the question bmw originally psted then:
I would not marry a porn star who is currently working as such, but if they have since left that job, no longer lead a promiscuous life, and respect sex as a demonstration of equal parts emotional love, and physical passion then I would consider them. Of course I would have to find other similarties and love them as a person before I would want to dedicate my love to them. But being a former porn star in of itself is not enough to cause me to disregard them as a partner.

Oh yea is all me. It must be nice to have such selective attention.

[morethanpretty]

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

Oh yea is all me. It must be nice to have such selective attention.

Originally Posted by morethanpretty

Trading insult after insult is really immature and it somewhat dissapoints me that we are so easily captured

[Elspode]

So...tell me again how adults doing what they want to other consenting adults is going to harm our society, influence our children and generally sap us of our essential fluids? 'Cause I'm not getting it. How, precisely, is being gay an abomination? Because someone slips Part A into Part C instead of Part B? I mean, I've slipped Part A into Mrs Elspode's Part C a few times. Does that make me abominable? What if I've spilled my seed on the ground a time or two?

I'm just trying to get a handle on this whole "abomination" thing. I'm completely lost.

Originally Posted by Elspode

So...tell me again how adults doing what they want to other consenting adults is going to harm our society, influence our children and generally sap us of our essential fluids? 'Cause I'm not getting it. How, precisely, is being gay an abomination? Because someone slips Part A into Part C instead of Part B? I mean, I've slipped Part A into Mrs Elspode's Part C a few times. Does that make me abominable? What if I've spilled my seed on the ground a time or two?

I'm just trying to get a handle on this whole "abomination" thing. I'm completely lost.

Ok, I'll try an answer your failure to understand this way; Life begins at conception, life is perpetuated by members of the same species through copulation between opposite of their respective sexes. I can't even think of one species of plant or animal on this wide earth that engages in homosexual acts on a regular base, if at all.

If not just that it runs counter to everything we see around us in the natural world it and the natural order if left to grow and spread it could theoretically lead to the extinction of all mankind. Now hows that for sapping the essential fluids out of ya.

Objection to homosexuality and its deviant behavior isn’t just based on personal dislike but a sound argument based on the natural world.

BTW, sodomy is an abomination because that’s not how those parts are supposed to be used. Abominations and our collective recognition of them stems from gross affronts to actions that fall outside the natural order of things and our collective definitions of social norms.


Getting a little clearer now?

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

I can't even think of one species of plant or animal on this wide earth that engages in homosexual acts on a regular base, if at all.

Most plants are bisexual.

Originally Posted by Happy Monkey

Most plants are bisexual.

Most still require cross pollination. That’s why the produce nectar to attract the birds and the bees. Bisexual is a mischaracterization. They have (plants) both male and female organs, so to speak, but still require the opposite gender to reproduce. The male parts do hump other male parts in a plant.

[Stormieweather]

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

~snip~

BTW, sodomy is an abomination because that’s not how those parts are supposed to be used.

~snip~

The logical assumption to be made from that statement would be that you are also against oral sex aka cunninglus and fellatio aka going down on or a blowjob? Because I doubt that is the primary function of the mouth and tongue.

Look at these people! They suck each other! They eat each other's saliva and dirt! — Tsonga people of southern Africa on the European practice of kissing, 1927

Bah! What about kissing??? Is that another misuse of body parts? I love kissing, have I been committing an abomination every time I kiss my partner ? Cuz you know, in some cultures and in some historic times...kissing has been either considered highly disgusting or acceptable among people of the same gender.

So who decides what is what here? If our society changes its views on what is acceptable over time, and different cultures views certain behaviors in a totally different light, then who is the ultimate abiter of what is right and what is wrong for you or for me?

Stormie

Originally Posted by Stormieweather

The logical assumption to be made from that statement would be that you are also against oral sex aka cunninglus and fellatio aka going down on or a blowjob? Because I doubt that is the primary function of the mouth and tongue.



Bah! What about kissing??? Is that another misuse of body parts? I love kissing, have I been committing an abomination every time I kiss my partner ? Cuz you know, in some cultures and in some historic times...kissing has been either considered highly disgusting or acceptable among people of the same gender.

So who decides what is what here? If our society changes its views on what is acceptable over time, and different cultures views certain behaviors in a totally different light, then who is the ultimate abiter of what is right and what is wrong for you or for me?

Stormie

This kind of issue sprawl has absolutely no value in moving the conversation. If you want to engage in a conversation then making silly and non-sense points isn't going to be productive. My point wasn't just confined to the function of the part but placed in the context of what we witness in the natural world. Making ridiculous issues out of a reasonable conversation is as immature as you can get. I not even going to address those idiotic remarks.

[John Adams]

Originally Posted by bmwmcaw

Ok, I'll try an answer your failure to understand this way; Life begins at conception, life is perpetuated by members of the same species through copulation between opposite of their respective sexes. I can't even think of one species of plant or animal on this wide earth that engages in homosexual acts on a regular base, if at all.

The gay penguin article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4352011/
Quick google search reveals lots more.

As far as homosexuality who cares. If they keep it private it doesn't matter to me what their preference is, of course that applies equally to heterosexuals. I don't need your preference shoved in my face.

As far as the original question, sure I would marry a porn star, of course I would require she be out of the business first and free from disease. BUt who cares, that was the past, sex is sex and love is much more.

Originally Posted by John Adams

The gay penguin article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4352011/
Quick google search reveals lots more.

As far as homosexuality who cares. If they keep it private it doesn't matter to me what their preference is, of course that applies equally to heterosexuals. I don't need your preference shoved in my face.

As far as the original question, sure I would marry a porn star, of course I would require she be out of the business first and free from disease. BUt who cares, that was the past, sex is sex and love is much more.