![]() |
|
|||||||
| The Internet Web sites, web development, email, chat, bandwidth, the net and society |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Getting older every day
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
I am only a new user to NOD32 (a few weeks), but I did a thorough investigation before I purchased it, and two friends who work in PC security recommended it. I would still recommend NOD32 over McAfee, based on the reviews I have already cited, and just about every PC magazine has rated it the best in detection and removal of viruses, root kits, etc.
__________________
History is a great teacher; it is a shame that people never learn from it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
My experience is that Norton and McAfee have both failed. I see no difference in one over the other when it comes to protection. But the Norton has repeatedly required them to call me for assistance. I never get the setup and license renewal problems with McAfee. BTW, for those who use AOL and are considering something else, first, upgrade to AOL's latest version (10?) where AOL finally provide workable protection. Execute that protection for free (because so many users of older AOL have malware). IOW upgrade only to finally clean your computer with their now free spam and antivirus software before terminating the AOL accounts. Every AOL connected machine I encountered contained malware. AOL finally addressed the problem with the latest AOL browser – too little too late. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Getting older every day
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
__________________
History is a great teacher; it is a shame that people never learn from it. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|