![]() |
|
Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
Quote:
How many people predicted exactly this? How many intelligence and military experts argued that this was a mistake? How much intelligence was found to have been erroneous, and worse still, known to be erroneous? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Actually quite a few, but they were shouted down. No, not shouted down. Pressured down? Threatened down? Squashed.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Quote:
To blame the intelligence as erroneous are how those without perspective now blame others. The intelligence was correct. People such as Chalabi were known to be scam artists. Curveball was the ONLY source for Iraq's mobile biological labs, was never interviewed by any Americans, and was a known alcoholic. As David Kay noted after reading the massive file on aluminum tubes, his own comment was, "Is that all there is?" The intelligence was correct. But the administration read it for a political agenda rather than to be a patriotic American. There was very good reason why my 2002 opposition to "Mission Accomplished" was so adamant and so accurate. Even the intelligence did not say Saddam had WMDs. Many (and rightly so) suspected he might. But not one intelligence source could define a single WMD after 1996 - for obvious reasons. They did not exist. Next, you should be answering why those administration people had a political agenda. The answer has been provided often, but somehow I suspect many never grasped the significance. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|