"I`M Leaving On A Jet Plane"

[piercehawkeye45]

Originally Posted by Ronald Cherrycoke

Yeah...right....at least she tried....Haaaaaa....haaaaaa...

Is that your only response?

[Ronald Cherrycoke]

Is that your only response?


Yawn.!..just another liberal complaining about her right to represent the "REAL" people...."Some People Are More Equal Than Others"..you don`t get it do you?

[piercehawkeye45]

I think senators should ride commerical unless they specifically need to fly direct or quickly. I'm not defending her but you always do the Haaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaaa thing when you have no response.

[Aliantha]

I think this particular 'scandal' if you could even call it that, is pretty small in comparison to the larger issues one could discuss.

[glatt]

Originally Posted by Aliantha

I think this particular 'scandal' if you could even call it that, is pretty small in comparison to the larger issues one could discuss.

The White House said the same thing yesterday.

To presidential spokesman Tony Snow, "This is a silly story and I think it's been unfair to the speaker."

the article also says it's a smear campaign by Republicans and is not necessarily based in reality:

Republicans, led by aggressive junior lawmakers, seized on the most extreme possibility: Pelosi's flying on the military equivalent of a Boeing 757 with the latest in travel comforts.

also

"I have never asked for any larger plane," Pelosi said. "I have said that I am happy to ride commercial if the plane they have doesn't go coast to coast."

And finally:

spokesman Tony Snow further stated "Ronald Cherrycoke is nothing but a common troll."

[xoxoxoBruce]

Republican leaders have also stated — with no tangible evidence....

And echoed by asshole cherrycoke. He has nothing substantial to add, so pages of huge, spread out posts, consisting of unnecessary quotes, and stupid cracks to avoid any meaningful dialog. In other words a troll.

[BigV]

Ronald Cherrycoke gets the same intelligence everyone else does, but how does he use it?

From here.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not request a larger plane for personal use to travel cross-country without stopping, Bill Livingood, the House sergeant at arms, said Thursday.

Livingood said the request was his, and he made it for security reasons.

"The fact that Speaker Pelosi lives in California compelled me to request an aircraft that is capable of making non-stop flights for security purposes, unless such an aircraft is unavailable," Livingood, who has been at his post for 11 years, said in a written statement.

"I regret that an issue that is exclusively considered and decided in a security context has evolved into a political issue," the statement said.

I'd say his remarks "were not illegal or unauthorized," they "did not provide the most accurate analysis of intelligence to senior decision makers" or the dwellars or other readers of this forum. While the justice system has no mechanism for responding to this sort of misbehavior, the cellar does.

Ronald Cherrycoke, you are hereby found guilty of trolling. While lumberjim finds sport in your type, I do not, you "context-shaving liar". You have been condemned to my ignore list. May you rot there in silence.

[Ronald Cherrycoke]

Originally Posted by BigV

Ronald Cherrycoke gets the same intelligence everyone else does, but how does he use it?

From here.



I'd say his remarks "were not illegal or unauthorized," they "did not provide the most accurate analysis of intelligence to senior decision makers" or the dwellars or other readers of this forum. While the justice system has no mechanism for responding to this sort of misbehavior, the cellar does.

Ronald Cherrycoke, you are hereby found guilty of trolling. While lumberjim finds sport in your type, I do not, you "context-shaving liar". You have been condemned to my ignore list. May you rot there in silence.

So I post an article three days ago from a legitimate news source and it turns out to be not entirely true and I`m guilty of being a troll and a liar? Wow wouldn`t be the first time the news is wrong.

P.S. Ignore buttons are for cowards.


THE WASHINGTON TIMES
February 7, 2007

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by Ronald Cherrycoke

So I post an article three days ago from a legitimate news source and it turns out to be not entirely true ...

You could have found out that it wasn't true three days ago.

[richlevy]

Originally Posted by Ronald Cherrycoke

So I post an article three days ago from a legitimate news source and it turns out to be not entirely true and I`m guilty of being a troll and a liar? Wow wouldn`t be the first time the news is wrong.

P.S. Ignore buttons are for cowards.


THE WASHINGTON TIMES
February 7, 2007

Legitimate news source - Well, each man chooses his poison.

Ignore buttons are for cowards. - Maybe, but until assault weapons are legal it's all we have.

I really need to find the liberal equivalent of the Washington Times for balance. Unfortunately, while the Post and Slate can be accused of a liberal bias, they tend to be too bound up in journalistic ethics to make a good match. Maybe if I could get the National Enquirer to do a series on national health care they could qualify as liberal.

[Ronald Cherrycoke]

I really need to find the liberal equivalent of the Washington Times for balance.


That`s easy Dude...it called the MSM..."Fake But Accurate"


Haaaaa....Haaaaaa...

[Ibby]

I think banning is in order for RC if he doesnt shape up fast.

[Ronald Cherrycoke]

Originally Posted by Ibram

I think banning is in order for RC if he doesnt shape up fast.

Ow....that hurts me to the heart!

Haaaaa...Haaaaaa...

[glatt]

Originally Posted by Ronald Cherrycoke

Haaaaa...Haaaaaa...

Troll

[Ronald Cherrycoke]

Hmmmm...how come it took Livingood three days to speak out...maybe that had to build an airplane for her?