"I`M Leaving On A Jet Plane"

[BigV]

Ronald Cherrycoke gets the same intelligence everyone else does, but how does he use it?

From here.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not request a larger plane for personal use to travel cross-country without stopping, Bill Livingood, the House sergeant at arms, said Thursday.

Livingood said the request was his, and he made it for security reasons.

"The fact that Speaker Pelosi lives in California compelled me to request an aircraft that is capable of making non-stop flights for security purposes, unless such an aircraft is unavailable," Livingood, who has been at his post for 11 years, said in a written statement.

"I regret that an issue that is exclusively considered and decided in a security context has evolved into a political issue," the statement said.

I'd say his remarks "were not illegal or unauthorized," they "did not provide the most accurate analysis of intelligence to senior decision makers" or the dwellars or other readers of this forum. While the justice system has no mechanism for responding to this sort of misbehavior, the cellar does.

Ronald Cherrycoke, you are hereby found guilty of trolling. While lumberjim finds sport in your type, I do not, you "context-shaving liar". You have been condemned to my ignore list. May you rot there in silence.

[Ronald Cherrycoke]

Originally Posted by BigV

Ronald Cherrycoke gets the same intelligence everyone else does, but how does he use it?

From here.



I'd say his remarks "were not illegal or unauthorized," they "did not provide the most accurate analysis of intelligence to senior decision makers" or the dwellars or other readers of this forum. While the justice system has no mechanism for responding to this sort of misbehavior, the cellar does.

Ronald Cherrycoke, you are hereby found guilty of trolling. While lumberjim finds sport in your type, I do not, you "context-shaving liar". You have been condemned to my ignore list. May you rot there in silence.

So I post an article three days ago from a legitimate news source and it turns out to be not entirely true and I`m guilty of being a troll and a liar? Wow wouldn`t be the first time the news is wrong.

P.S. Ignore buttons are for cowards.


THE WASHINGTON TIMES
February 7, 2007

[Happy Monkey]

Originally Posted by Ronald Cherrycoke

So I post an article three days ago from a legitimate news source and it turns out to be not entirely true ...

You could have found out that it wasn't true three days ago.

[richlevy]

Originally Posted by Ronald Cherrycoke

So I post an article three days ago from a legitimate news source and it turns out to be not entirely true and I`m guilty of being a troll and a liar? Wow wouldn`t be the first time the news is wrong.

P.S. Ignore buttons are for cowards.


THE WASHINGTON TIMES
February 7, 2007

Legitimate news source - Well, each man chooses his poison.

Ignore buttons are for cowards. - Maybe, but until assault weapons are legal it's all we have.

I really need to find the liberal equivalent of the Washington Times for balance. Unfortunately, while the Post and Slate can be accused of a liberal bias, they tend to be too bound up in journalistic ethics to make a good match. Maybe if I could get the National Enquirer to do a series on national health care they could qualify as liberal.

[Ronald Cherrycoke]

I really need to find the liberal equivalent of the Washington Times for balance.


That`s easy Dude...it called the MSM..."Fake But Accurate"


Haaaaa....Haaaaaa...