Oregon teacher fired after veering from evolution textbook

[tw]

PowerPoint presentation that made links between evolution, Nazi Germany and Planned Parenthood.

Now tell me what this means. To me: Zero. There is not one detail sufficient to draw anything but a classic emotional conclusion. For that matter, I want to see those links - that presentation. Either it is as others have only speculated, or it is a rather interesting analysis of perspective.

This is the same exact complain I had with so many here who believed George Jr's lies about WMDs. Those lies were justified by the exact same superficial assumptions being made here about this guy's presentation.

Well maybe those who decided to fire him first learned those details. Or maybe they used the same rational being used here. I don't know. What I do know is that people here have opinions without learning any of the necessary and sufficient details. That article tells us not one sufficient fact for anyone to have an opinion. The only thing we do know is that school administrators did meet with the teacher for 90 minutes before firing him. When is that sufficient for anyone here to have an opinion?

Originally Posted by tw

Now tell me what this means. To me: Zero. There is not one detail sufficient to draw anything but a classic emotional conclusion. For that matter, I want to see those links - that presentation. Either it is as others have only speculated, or it is a rather interesting analysis of perspective.

This is the same exact complain I had with so many here who believed George Jr's lies about WMDs. Those lies were justified by the exact same superficial assumptions being made here about this guy's presentation.

Well maybe those who decided to fire him first learned those details. Or maybe they used the same rational being used here. I don't know. What I do know is that people here have opinions without learning any of the necessary and sufficient details. That article tells us not one sufficient fact for anyone to have an opinion. The only thing we do know is that school administrators did meet with the teacher for 90 minutes before firing him. When is that sufficient for anyone here to have an opinion?

So, you think we should discuss a conspiracy involving the school administration and possibly the reporters lying about the Power Point presentation and what was said to the students?

[tw]

Originally Posted by rkzenrage

So, you think we should discuss a conspiracy involving the school administration and possibly the reporters lying about the Power Point presentation and what was said to the students?

Had I been giving the presentation, I would have also added propaganda from Listerine. But then I am now proposing a teacher's presentation that was completely different ... and still in complete agreement with the news report.

rkzenrage - you have implied one interpretation of the facts. That is also why I could saw through myths called 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'. I did not draw conclusions based in spin or implicataions. I used only facts and discovered many other 'realities'.

Well the school administration apparently sees things differently. Were they right? Not a single lurker here can say. Facts as posted here could say he was demonstrating example of spin and propaganda. Can you point to a fact that says otherwise? Only one. The school administration apparently concluded - and we can only speculate on this - concluded that he was not doing as the teacher claimed.

Nothing in those power point descriptions says anything definitive; only that a parent viewed the power point slides and drew a conclusion. We don't even know what the school administration concluded. Was the teacher promoting god? We only know what school board actions were.