Shooting at Virginia Tech

[Spexxvet]

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

You get what you get because your arguments are all crime- and genocide-friendly, Spexx.

You give what you give because your arguments are all murder- and violence-friendly, Urb.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

You prove, at length, redundantly, and ad nauseam that your morals just aren't what they could be, nor what you suppose them to be.

Thankfully, my morals just aren't what they could be - they could be anti-humanity, like yours.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

That's called having a disconnect in your brain.

At least I have a brain and twice your IQ.

Originally Posted by Urbane Guerrilla

The rest of us, happily, are better adjusted.

Ignorance is bliss.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

You give what you give because your arguments are all murder- and violence-friendly, Urb.


Thankfully, my morals just aren't what they could be - they could be anti-humanity, like yours.


At least I have a brain and twice your IQ.



Ignorance is bliss.

Wrong. Everyone here but you knows that. Having no actual rebuttal, you resort to bitchery, thereby condemning yourself.

For instance: for a brain, you have a hoplophobic neurosis and no connection with the realities of armed self defense, as all our previous dispute has made clear. Never credit yourself with intelligence when you're busily refusing to use any.

Pro-self-defense is anti-humanity? You're over the edge.

I've decided to prevail shoud someone want to murder me. You aren't going to, and you're immoral enough to ask that I take your view of it. Hell no.

Your careful ignorance is lethal -- to you. My careful knowledge will aid me.

[Urbane Guerrilla]

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

You give what you give because your arguments are all murder- and violence-friendly, Urb.


Thankfully, my morals just aren't what they could be - they could be anti-humanity, like yours.

Further refutation of your argument, Spexx, may be found in Thomas Hobbes' The Leviathan: in Chapter 14, he presents two natural laws:

. . .the first. . . which is to seek peace and follow it. The second, the sum of the right of nature, by all means we can to defend ourselves.

The structure is rather strangely inverted, but the idea is a good one.

You're pretty good at the first of these; I'm considerably better than you at the second. That this discrepancy should anger you so, and motivate you to dish out the guff you have is puzzling, for I do not despise nor do I fail to practice the first.

The Leviathan