Do You Own a Gun?

[xoxoxoBruce]

Another ridiculous statement not based in fact. I have many handguns and not one was purchased to kill someone nor have they.

Oh, and poisons are weapons, sometimes weapons of mass destruction.

[Shawnee123]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

I have many handguns and not one was purchased to kill someone nor have they.

.

Of course not, because "guns don't kill people. People kill people." Right?

[xoxoxoBruce]

That's right, sometimes with poison.

[Spexxvet]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Another ridiculous statement not based in fact. I have many handguns and not one was purchased to kill someone nor have they.

For what ridiculous reason did you buy guns, then, Bruce?

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Oh, and poisons are weapons, sometimes weapons of mass destruction.

I'll restate: Poison isn't a weapon that I buy to kill someone. Poison may be a weapon that you buy to kill someone, same as a handgun.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

For what ridiculous reason did you buy guns, then, Bruce?

I'll restate: Poison isn't a weapon that I buy to kill someone. Poison may be a weapon that you buy to kill someone, same as a handgun.

Ya know, Spex, I'm getting sick and fucking tired of you telling why I do things. You have no fucking idea why I do anything, so stop it, right fucking now.

[Spexxvet]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Ya know, Spex, I'm getting sick and fucking tired of you telling why I do things. You have no fucking idea why I do anything, so stop it, right fucking now.

Main Entry: 1may
Function: verbal auxiliary
... used to indicate possibility or probability <you may be right> <things you may need> -- sometimes used interchangeably with can <one of those slipups that may happen from time to time -- Jessica Mitford> -- sometimes used where might would be expected <you may think from a little distance that the country was solid woods -- Robert Frost>

Main Entry: 1tell
4 a : to give information to : INFORM <tell us about your job> b : to assure emphatically <they did not do it, I tell you>

Ya know, Bruce, I'm getting sick and fucking tired of you not understanding the English language. You have no fucking idea how to understand plain English, so get a clue, right fucking now.

Should I interpret your saying I have poisons in my house that can be used to kill people to be TELLING me that I'm going to poison someone?

Oh, and way to avoid answering the fucking question.

[xoxoxoBruce]

No you dumb motherfucker, I don't presume to know why you do anything, and you have no clairvoyance either.

I pointed out, you having the means(poision) to kill somebody in your house doesn't mean you intend on doing that. Even though you're making that very same presumption of others, which is asinine. It's like me saying you bought a dog to rip peoples throats out.

When you do that shit, it's more than being presumptuous, it's flat out lies.

[Radar]

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

For what ridiculous reason did you buy guns, then, Bruce?

I'll restate: Poison isn't a weapon that I buy to kill someone. Poison may be a weapon that you buy to kill someone, same as a handgun.

Bruce, why waste your time on a useless idiot who claims your reasons for owning something are ridiculous? Your reasons for owning a gun are irrelevant as long as you don't use them to violate the person, property, or rights of non-consenting others. You can buy a gun to prop up a table leg and it's none of his fucking business.

Neither he, nor the combined population of the planet earth minus you has any say in whether or not you may or may not own a gun. It's your RIGHT to own any number of any type of gun you want without limits and the same is true of the amount and type of ammunition you want. Not one person, or a group of people regardless of their number (even if they call themselves "government") has any legitimate authority over whether or not you own a million guns with a billion rounds of armor piercing ammunition without any serial numbers or registration of those guns.

100% of gun control laws are a violation of the Constitution and of our INDIVIDUAL natural, undeniable, self-evident, immutable, and inalienable rights.

Anyone who says otherwise is an idiot, a liar, or an asshole... or all of the above.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by Radar

Bruce, why waste your time on a useless idiot who claims your reasons for owning something are ridiculous?

Because he crossed the line. He's not not arguing his position against handguns, he's making personal accusations, of me buying guns with the intent of killing people. That lie is unacceptable and can't go unanswered.

[Spexxvet]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

Because he crossed the line. He's not not arguing his position against handguns, he's making personal accusations, of me buying guns with the intent of killing people. That lie is unacceptable and can't go unanswered.

Really? If someone forced their way into your house and threatened you with a baseball bat, what would you do? Don't avoid the question, this time. You're making accusations, answer the question.

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

Really? If someone forced their way into your house and threatened you with a baseball bat, what would you do? Don't avoid the question, this time. You're making accusations, answer the question.

If someone broke in your house and threatened to kill you with a baseball bat, wouldn't you use any means at your disposal to defend yourself? Of course you would.
Does that mean you bought that knife, lamp, golf club, crowbar, to kill someone? No, that's a stupid assumption.

If your dog attacks and rips the intruders throat out, does that mean you bought the dog to kill people? No, that's a stupid assumption.

Does that mean if I shoot that same attacker, I bought that gun to kill someone? No, that's a stupid assumption.

[Spexxvet]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

If someone broke in your house and threatened to kill you with a baseball bat, wouldn't you use any means at your disposal to defend yourself? Of course you would.
Does that mean you bought that knife, lamp, golf club, crowbar, to kill someone? No, that's a stupid assumption.

If your dog attacks and rips the intruders throat out, does that mean you bought the dog to kill people? No, that's a stupid assumption.

Does that mean if I shoot that same attacker, I bought that gun to kill someone? No, that's a stupid assumption.

Answer the question.

[Spexxvet]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

I wouldn't have to if you weren't being such an asshole with you stupid illogical claims and lying about me, Fuck you.

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

If someone broke in your house and threatened to kill you with a baseball bat, wouldn't you use any means at your disposal to defend yourself? Of course you would.
...

Fuck yourself, hypocrite.

[Radar]

Originally Posted by Spexxvet

Really? If someone forced their way into your house and threatened you with a baseball bat, what would you do? Don't avoid the question, this time. You're making accusations, answer the question.

If someone forced their way into my home and threatened any member of my family, I'd exercise my right to defend my life, property, and family and I'd shoot the motherfucker in DEFENSE. Depending on the situation, it may be a shot to kill or a shot to wound. I'd use whatever level of force I personally deemed appropriate up to and including deadly force.

That's the part morons like you don't get. You make no distinction between killing in defense, and killing to attack. Not one person in the entire recorded history of mankind has ever been killed by a gun. There have been plenty of people killed by other people who were using guns.

A gun is an inanimate object and we have a RIGHT to own any weapon we obtain honestly without any government oversight, permission, or limitations. No person or group of people regardless of their number has any authority or right to prevent another from owning any weapons they choose.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by Radar

If someone forced their way into my home and threatened any member of my family, I'd exercise my right to defend my life, property, and family and I'd shoot the motherfucker in DEFENSE. Depending on the situation, it may be a shot to kill or a shot to wound. I'd use whatever level of force I personally deemed appropriate up to and including deadly force.

That's the part morons like you don't get. You make no distinction between killing in defense, and killing to attack. Not one person in the entire recorded history of mankind has ever been killed by a gun. There have been plenty of people killed by other people who were using guns.

A gun is an inanimate object and we have a RIGHT to own any weapon we obtain honestly without any government oversight, permission, or limitations. No person or group of people regardless of their number has any authority or right to prevent another from owning any weapons they choose.

You are wasting your time on this one Radar. I don't think he will ever get it. Criminals need victims, we will never be one.