![]() |
|
Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
He was removed for going over time, not his questions.
He resisted being removed and then being cuffed. That is why he was tazed. I think he was tazed too much, but the first time was fine. You don't resist arrest. He had not been searched and the cops had no idea what he had on him, his level of training or what he was capable of/had in mind. He needed to comply. It is actually that simple. I know this sounds odd coming from me, but he was out of line and resisted arrest, what do you expect the cops to do, buy him a brownie? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Extraordinary Machine
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Outside of Washington, DC
Posts: 307
|
Quote:
I think a lot of people online who were upset about the incident have exaggerated ideas about how dangerous tasers are. It isn't what I'd call safe, sane and consentual, but it sure beats the good old-fashioned billy club or gun butt method. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
no not that other guy, the other one
Join Date: May 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 640
|
Quote:
__________________
I should be working. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
He was misbehaving. I have not seen a clear video yet but he was already taken down, so I'd think the taser was not necessary. Is this what comes from hiring people incapable of doing a job?
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|