Quote:
|
Your response was an outright and unneccesary attack
|
In no way was it an attack, it was an accurate description of what she was doing, rehashing a topic that had been previously exhausted, ad-naseum, previously in the thread... a thread she had not read.
Yes, she had been invited, how does that precode reading it?
I stated dyslexia can occur in any intelligence range, clearly and concisely. Two posts later. You must have missed that one. Please, go check it out.
I'm glad you are better at diagnosing me over the net than the professionals that have in person, more than once... you are truly skilled!
Quote:
|
Now. I haven't returned to this topic because I hate you, wish to stalk you, wish you ill, or enjoy getting a rise out of you. I have returned to it, because you are barking up entirely the wrong tree, and it happens to be a tree I'm quite fond of.
|
Actually, you have returned and posted an extensive and factually incorrect attack.