Logic as Arbiter of Truth

[juju]

Originally posted by Whit
As I said, a misuse of logic. It does present a logical arguement. The fact that you can make a logical arguement to disprove it doesn't change anything. You didn't ask for an irrefutable example. Just an example.

Doesn't the fact that it misuses the term "exist" make it illogical?

Anyway, it's all well and good to have a closed system, but in the real wold we don't always know all the facts. Does unknown information that would affect an outcome make an argument illogical?