Kenya in Crisis

[tw]

Originally Posted by Brianna

Speak for yourself, tw.

I requoted our extremists who see no profit in going there. Why is Brianna defending those whose underlying political agenda is based in hate and violence?

Meanwhile, moderates will recognize Kenya as a country undergoing some turmoil. This is far from Rwanda and Brunei deja vue. At least not yet. Counter productive would be other nations interfering at this point. If Kenyans solve this problem, then 50 burned victims in a church could become memorialized as what happens when extremists are permitted to exercise their usual solutions to everything - violence.

Kenyans and only Kenyans currently are our best hope for a lasting solution here. Kenyans must be permitted time to solve their own problems. If major actions are required as became necessary in the Balkans, then such actions will require the UN - in direct contradiction to those who just reposted Rush Limbaugh extremist rhetoric.

[classicman]

Originally Posted by TheMercenary

Let the Africans figure it out on their own. We have no business there.

Originally Posted by tw

Kenyans and only Kenyans currently are our best hope for a lasting solution here. Kenyans must be permitted time to solve their own problems.

Hmmm looks like you are both saying the same thing to me.

[deadbeater]

Sorry, the US is too busy in Afghanistan and Iraq to care about a few Africans.

I think that Kanye West is more and more right: 'Bush doesn't care about Black people'.

Originally Posted by deadbeater

'Bush doesn't care about Black people'.

Eh? I thought he was sleeping with Condo-lazy Rice.

Originally Posted by piercehawkeye45

Bush doesn't care about Brown people either.

So what about "Yellow people"?

[ZenGum]

Originally Posted by Aretha's doctor

So what about "Yellow people"?

He owes them money.

Originally Posted by ZenGum

He owes them money.

[tw]

Originally Posted by classicman

Hmmm looks like you are both saying the same thing to me.

I keep posting this. Please learn to read with care what was posted rather than what you want to read.

TheMercenary is saying we have no purpose in Kenya like we have no purpose in Bosnia. He says the UN is our useless enemy when, if the world eventually has to solve Kenya, then we will need the UN.

Where, classicman, do we say same thing? Posts from tw and TheMercenary are completely different - if classicman grasps the significant details. You didn't previously which was why you felt insulted when no insult was posted. You really need to reread multiple times before posting. Classicman has again completely misrepresented what was posted.

Did you notice we say contrary things about the UN? Did you notice we post contrary conclusions about Bosnia - where the lessons of how to conduct nation building are demonstrated? He says America got beat up in Bosnia. Wacko extremists (ie Rush Limbaugh) promote that lie. In reality, Bosnia was a perfect example of how to do nation building. Did you notice our posts use both examples to reach contrary conclusions about Kenya? Do you read before posting? Why must I again resummarized (or requote) details that you completely ignore? Why do you set yourself up again to be criticized for replying to posts that do not exist? Will you now take insult where none exists?