Parental Rights

[monster]

So what's your viewpoint on the regulation/overseeing of homeschooling, jinx? An insider's view? Should there be some sort of checks and balances to detect the odd family who "homeschools" because they are dysfunctional rather than because it's the right thing for them? Or would any checks only serve to harass the majority who are doing a good job?

[xoxoxoBruce]

I should think neglect and abuse, athough subjective, would be easier to judge than whether they were doing a good job of home schooling.

[monster]

Originally Posted by xoxoxoBruce

I should think neglect and abuse, athough subjective, would be easier to judge than whether they were doing a good job of home schooling.

But isn't the point that the paper is trying to make (albeit in a very slanted way) that if there are no home schooling checks, there there's no possible way to observe neglect/abuse, whereas if the kids were in school or were checked on, they would at least be observed by outsiders occasionally, so there would be a chance of it being spotted?

[xoxoxoBruce]

Originally Posted by monster

But isn't the point that the paper is trying to make (albeit in a very slanted way) that if there are no home schooling checks, there there's no possible way to observe neglect/abuse, whereas if the kids were in school or were checked on, they would at least be observed by outsiders occasionally, so there would be a chance of it being spotted?

I agree, that's their position, but it's just a huge solution to a small problem, and as usual with such solutions, not foolproof.

[aimeecc]

I think any school or neighbor knows when a child is being "homeschooled" that actually isn't. Like in the DC case, they knew the kids really weren't being home schooled, and one social worker tried, but no one would follow up. Several people have been fired over it. Neighbors know when kids really aren't being homeschooled, or which parents shouldn't homeschool. And many will call Child Services... and sadly many won't because they don't want to upset anyone or their too lazy.

My neighbor years ago (although not home-schooling) accused me of calling Child Services on her. I didn't. I mostly thought that although she definitely wasn't a good mom or role model or surrounded by role models, I could tell she loved her son. He wasn't being beaten or starving, more just like he was being raised by someone with the mentality of a 15 year old. And I figured life "in the system" for the boy would be worse than life with her. Turned out it was another neighbor. CPS interviewed me. He stayed at the home. I moved. Heard later he was removed and put in foster care. I really don't know if that was a move for the better or not.

A government system doesn't need to exist to check on home schoolers. People just need to do the right thing and call the appropriate agency when they think there's something wrong.

[jinx]

Originally Posted by monster

So what's your viewpoint on the regulation/overseeing of homeschooling, jinx? An insider's view? Should there be some sort of checks and balances to detect the odd family who "homeschools" because they are dysfunctional rather than because it's the right thing for them? Or would any checks only serve to harass the majority who are doing a good job?

I think the government needs to take the position that parents want to do right by their children unless shown evidence to the contrary - at which point the govt services already in place need to actually work.

The NYT article pisses me off so bad I can't put coherent thoughts together about it yet - other than Hillary and her fucking village can kiss my fucking ass.

[monster]

Originally Posted by jinx

I think the government needs to take the position that parents want to do right by their children unless shown evidence to the contrary

If the parents choose to keep the children completely hidden from view, though, how is anyone going to see any evidence to the contrary?

[jinx]

Originally Posted by monster

If the parents choose to keep the children completely hidden from view, though, how is anyone going to see any evidence to the contrary?

In that case they wouldn't. In other cases there will be lots of evidence and no one will report it. Sometimes it will get reported and no one will respond etc. etc.