Science, Religion, and the Surrounding Confusion.

HungLikeJesus · 07-09-2008, 10:42 PM

r.j I've read that paper, and I think they made a fundamental error in using the "0" symbol. See here for further discussion.

regular.joe · 07-10-2008, 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HungLikeJesus

r.j I've read that paper, and I think they made a fundamental error in using the "0" symbol. See here for further discussion.

Impeccable, irrefutable, logical, self-actualized reasoning. Who can argue with that?

07-09-2008, 10:42 PM	#1
HungLikeJesus Only looks like a disaster tourist Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: above 7,000 feet Posts: 7,208	r.j I've read that paper, and I think they made a fundamental error in using the "0" symbol. See here for further discussion. __________________ Keep Your Bodies Off My Lawn SteveDallas's Random Thread Picker.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)