Saving the US Auto Industry

[tw]

Originally Posted by classicman

ok tw, ... What are your plans going forward?

Since you claim to read before you reply, then you know solutions were posted repeatedly. Please. Show us that you do more than post wisecracks. Show us that you actually comprehended what you replied to. Since solutions were posted repeatedly, and since classicman claims to understand what he reads, then classicman can repeat those previous solutions.

Anyone can read The Economist and numerous other publications. Not all readers bother to grasp facts. Many readers simply seek facts that agree with their political agenda – ignore everything else. classicman - this is where you demonstrate which kind of reader you are. Those solutions have been posted repeatedly. Your question was answered previously if you read for knowledge. Show us that you read to understand; not read to simply reinforce a political agenda. You can answer your own question IF you comprehended what contradicts political bias.

[TheMercenary]

Originally Posted by tw

Since you claim to read before you reply, then you know solutions were posted repeatedly. Please. Show us that you do more than post wisecracks. Show us that you actually comprehended what you replied to. Since solutions were posted repeatedly, and since classicman claims to understand what he reads, then classicman can repeat those previous solutions.

Anyone can read The Economist and numerous other publications. Not all readers bother to grasp facts. Many readers simply seek facts that agree with their political agenda – ignore everything else. classicman - this is where you demonstrate which kind of reader you are. Those solutions have been posted repeatedly. Your question was answered previously if you read for knowledge. Show us that you read to understand; not read to simply reinforce a political agenda. You can answer your own question IF you comprehended what contradicts political bias.

Classic, I do declare that he clearly states above that he has no answer.

[classicman]

Originally Posted by tw

Show us that you do more than post wisecracks. Since solutions were posted repeatedly~snip~

Nope - I have not seen one post of yours present ANY original thought or solution. Simple regurgitations of that which was previously published in The Economist do NOT count. Try again.

Originally Posted by tw

Anyone can read The Economist and numerous other publications.
Many readers simply seek facts that agree with their political agenda – ignore everything else.
Those solutions have been posted repeatedly. tw, Show us that you read to understand; not read to simply reinforce a political agenda. You can answer your own question IF you comprehended what contradicts political bias.

True, anyone can read The Economist as tw has repeatedly posted to a point beyond redundancy. PLEASE POST original solutions and/or suggestions without quoting The Economist - just once. No mental midgets or 85% of top management allowed. Criticism will not work either. Since tw has such a high opinion of him/herself, this should be easy and should take no more than two paragraphs. No political agenda, nor biases allowed. Now please try again. Oh and answering a question by directing another poster to answer if for you doesn't count either. That would amount to simply attacking another poster which we all know tw would never do.