The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-11-2009, 01:13 PM   #11
Phage0070
Snooty Borg
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnyxCougar View Post
"Evolutionary Science" does not provide a reasonable explanation for how the universe explodes out of nothing, how life is created from non life, or how amoebas evolve into men.
This is only partially correct. Evolutionary science provides a reasonable explanation for only the last thing you listed, "how amoebas evolve into men". It does not explain the other things you listed simply because it is not meant to explain such things. You are confusing religion which is designed to be an all-encompassing explanation with science which limits itself to explaining observations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnyxCougar View Post
The evidences that "Evolutionary Scientists" use can be reasonably proved to be at least open to question (the speed of light, carbon dating), fraudulent (Lucy) or outright wrong (gillslits in foetii, moth experiments).
This is true; by the very nature of basing their findings on evidence scientists leave the foundations of their theories open to question. Evidence can be open to question, fraudulent, wrong... or even completely accurate. This is the strength of science and logic; we can examine various ideas and determine if they are correct or not. This lends long-standing scientific principles significant credibility.

Compare this to religion which bases their beliefs on faith; faith is not open to question at all. Faith cannot be reasonably proved to be *anything* because it deliberately violates the requirements of reason. This is the fundamental weakness of religion; we cannot examine various ideas and determine if they are correct or not. This lends long-standing religious principles significant doubt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OnyxCougar View Post
Origins is a religious discussion, regardless of which side you're on.
This is not correct. There are fundamental and irreconcilable differences in the methods of thinking between religious and scientific people, so it may be that a discussion of origins between two such people becomes two different discussions altogether. However, origins can and is approached from a scientific angle frequently.
Phage0070 is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.