The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-27-2009, 12:17 AM   #11
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
It says this...

But the truth is, we just don't know. Larger credit problems or a severe downturn still could threaten these banks, especially regional banks that own a lot of risky mortgages. If the banks go down, the government may have to spend more money forcing them to merge — and that could set off a whole new cycle of uncertainty.

Q: Does that mean we're staying on the bailout train?

A: For the foreseeable future. Regulators have decided these banks are "too big to fail." In other words, their failures could wreak havoc on the financial system, like what happened last fall when Lehman Bros. declared bankruptcy. By all indications, the Fed is ready to do whatever it takes to make sure that doesn't happen again.


So let me get this straight, these banks are too big to fail, but if one or more is unable to weather the economy, they will have to merge with other big banks too big to fail? Aren't we exacerbating the problem? Shouldn't they broken down into smaller banks instead?

Geez, the way smart people think sometimes is beyond my reasoning.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.