The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-05-2009, 12:54 PM   #9
Redux
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
...the present Court, which is made up entirely of former federal appeals-court judges who have little or no political experience...
I dont see why federal bench experience should be a prerequisite, despite recent trends.

We've had some good or great justices w/o such experience:
Willam Rehnquist
Lewis Powell
Byron "Whizzer" White
Earl Warren (a politician, Gov of California)
William O Douglas
Felix Frankfurter
Louis Brandieis
By historical standards or at least in the view of many historians and judicial scholars, many of these guys were considered great justices (w/ Rehnquist being the least great of the bunch, IMO). Are Constitutional issues that much more complex now that federal bench experience should be required?

I would not mind at all if Obama looks outside the federal appeals courts.
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.