The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Current Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2009, 11:55 AM   #1
lookout123
changed his status to single
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Right behind you. No, the other side.
Posts: 10,308
damn those banks for not wanting legislation allowing people who can't afford their homes to keep them. the devils!
__________________
Getting knocked down is no sin, it's not getting back up that's the sin
lookout123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2009, 03:18 PM   #2
tw
Read? I only know how to write.
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123 View Post
damn those banks for not wanting legislation allowing people who can't afford their homes to keep them.
When banks were responsible - did not have a mafioso persona - banks lend only to those who could afford it. Now that they have so many customers that should never be approved, well, it is the customer's fault?

Banks once determined when someone could afford it. Now that the purpose of any company is profits, screw the applicant. Only profits are important.

But again, any company whose purpose is profits therefore deserves to have no profits - and severe punishment.

How curious. Those using extremist politics also advocate a mafia objecctive of profits only - screw the employee, customer, economy, and product. This is Rush Limbaugh’s philosophy that even called Colin Powell a flaming liberal.

Banks that did their job have customers who could afford their homes. Oh. That means the product is more important than profits? A concept so difficult for loyal Limbaugh extremists to admit. Screw the customer. If he cannot afford the house, we will put him there anyway to maximize profits. Extremists say that is good. And now blame the customers for not doing what every bank once had to do when banks had to be responsible.

Clearly that flaming liberal Colin Powell is to blame.
tw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2009, 07:42 AM   #3
sugarpop
Professor
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the edge of the abyss
Posts: 1,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123 View Post
damn those banks for not wanting legislation allowing people who can't afford their homes to keep them. the devils!
You know a lot of the people who have lost their home or are in danger of losing their home did nothing wrong. They bought the right house, they could afford it, it wasn't a problem, but after the economy tanked, and people started losing jobs, or getting pay cuts, they couldn't afford to keep them. Some people probably tried to sell their house, but couldn't, because the market is so bad.

AND, let's not forget, those banks are complicit in giving people mortgages they knew they couldn't afford. They were the ones in the position of power. They are the more responsible individuals here for putting someone into a house they clearly could not afford. And that doesn't even go into all the other shady trickses financial institutions were doing.

I'm sick of people blaming only the people who bought more house than they could afford, because those people are not the ones who caused the crash. The people in power are the ones who caused it. Any ethical bank is not going to sign off on a mortgage that someone cannot afford. And the banks who did just turned around and sold it to someone else so they wouldn't be responsible for it. It was wrong, what all those financial people did.
sugarpop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.