Fantasy Football 2009

lumberjim · 08-09-2009, 09:58 PM

i see glatt and blue in the finals

bluecuracao · 08-10-2009, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim

i see glatt and blue in the finals

Awesome! I haven't even looked at my team yet.

W.HI.P · 08-11-2009, 12:17 AM

i've done pretty well predicting the winner of these leagues, so i'll have another go at it.

central

ruffriders
how tf did you get such a good team.
not only are you gonna win this division, but you're odds on favorite to win it all.

whip
i'd have a better shot if this was an online draft.
not much to do here but watch what falls in your lap.
i lack at qb, so it'll be tough to compete.

bullies
not bad at all, you've got a well rounded team.
if it wasn't for ruffriders, you'd be able to win this division.

goats
i would have thought you'd be a contender based on your past goats.
this is does not look good for you.
drew brees should have another good year, and you've got some wide recievers, but you're non-existant at running back, and you hold one of the weakest defences in the nfl....

east

eaglegreen
again, you're a competitor.
you will compete for this division, but you're out-classed by ruffriders team.

troop
you've got just as much possibilities as eaglegreen at winning this division

sysadmins

you have no qb.... you'll have to get one, or you will be bel;ow .500

rainbow
its not really gonna work for you.
you have too many players that shouldn't be in your roster...make some changes or you'll lose more games than you win.

west

riverrats
nice team, you're the favorite in this division.
you lack 1 running back, but other than that, you're elite.

warbird
you have an average team, and only due to the lack of serious opponents in your division can you have hope

mostlydead

no running backs, trade for one at least....also, kurt is questionable at qb, and your back-up is mediocre.

sycamore
no wide recievers, no running back, gives you the worst record in the cellar league 2009

lumberjim · 12-20-2009, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by W.HI.P

i've done pretty well predicting the winner of these leagues, so i'll have another go at it.

central

ruffriders
how tf did you get such a good team.
not only are you gonna win this division, but you're odds on favorite to win it all.

whip
i'd have a better shot if this was an online draft.
not much to do here but watch what falls in your lap.
i lack at qb, so it'll be tough to compete.

bullies
not bad at all, you've got a well rounded team.
if it wasn't for ruffriders, you'd be able to win this division.

goats
i would have thought you'd be a contender based on your past goats.
this is does not look good for you.
drew brees should have another good year, and you've got some wide recievers, but you're non-existant at running back, and you hold one of the weakest defences in the nfl....

east

eaglegreen
again, you're a competitor.
you will compete for this division, but you're out-classed by ruffriders team.

troop
you've got just as much possibilities as eaglegreen at winning this division

sysadmins

you have no qb.... you'll have to get one, or you will be bel;ow .500

rainbow
its not really gonna work for you.
you have too many players that shouldn't be in your roster...make some changes or you'll lose more games than you win.

west

riverrats
nice team, you're the favorite in this division.
you lack 1 running back, but other than that, you're elite.

warbird
you have an average team, and only due to the lack of serious opponents in your division can you have hope

mostlydead

no running backs, trade for one at least....also, kurt is questionable at qb, and your back-up is mediocre.

sycamore
no wide recievers, no running back, gives you the worst record in the cellar league 2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim

i see glatt and blue in the finals

.
Well, I have shot at being half right?

jinx · 12-20-2009, 06:50 PM

I'm taking a clobbering. Damn it to crap.

lumberjim · 12-20-2009, 07:57 PM

It will be totally bogus if the warbirds win this. plthjinx is CLEARLY not managing his team.

Griff · 12-20-2009, 08:07 PM

*sigh* Just got my team squared away in time for elimination...

glatt · 12-20-2009, 08:46 PM

My plan of making Tony feel secure is working perfectly. He probably thinks he's going to win. But Jacobs hasn't played yet. This is going to be one to tell the grandchildren.

Griff · 12-20-2009, 09:16 PM

Okay you put him to sleep, time to drop the hammer.

plthijinx · 12-23-2009, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lumberjim

It will be totally bogus if the warbirds win this. plthjinx is CLEARLY not managing his team.

weekly

08-09-2009, 09:58 PM	#1
lumberjim I can hear my ears Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 25,571	i see glatt and blue in the finals __________________ This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan

08-11-2009, 12:17 AM	#3
W.HI.P Free Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 1,513	i've done pretty well predicting the winner of these leagues, so i'll have another go at it. central ruffriders how tf did you get such a good team. not only are you gonna win this division, but you're odds on favorite to win it all. whip i'd have a better shot if this was an online draft. not much to do here but watch what falls in your lap. i lack at qb, so it'll be tough to compete. bullies not bad at all, you've got a well rounded team. if it wasn't for ruffriders, you'd be able to win this division. goats i would have thought you'd be a contender based on your past goats. this is does not look good for you. drew brees should have another good year, and you've got some wide recievers, but you're non-existant at running back, and you hold one of the weakest defences in the nfl.... east eaglegreen again, you're a competitor. you will compete for this division, but you're out-classed by ruffriders team. troop you've got just as much possibilities as eaglegreen at winning this division sysadmins you have no qb.... you'll have to get one, or you will be bel;ow .500 rainbow its not really gonna work for you. you have too many players that shouldn't be in your roster...make some changes or you'll lose more games than you win. west riverrats nice team, you're the favorite in this division. you lack 1 running back, but other than that, you're elite. warbird you have an average team, and only due to the lack of serious opponents in your division can you have hope mostlydead no running backs, trade for one at least....also, kurt is questionable at qb, and your back-up is mediocre. sycamore no wide recievers, no running back, gives you the worst record in the cellar league 2009 __________________ pls stfu k thx

12-20-2009, 06:50 PM	#5
jinx Come on, cat. Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area Posts: 7,013	I'm taking a clobbering. Damn it to crap. __________________ Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.

12-20-2009, 07:57 PM	#6
lumberjim I can hear my ears Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 25,571	It will be totally bogus if the warbirds win this. plthjinx is CLEARLY not managing his team. __________________ This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality Embrace this moment, remember We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion ~MJKeenan

12-20-2009, 08:07 PM	#7
Griff still says videotape Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 26,813	sigh Just got my team squared away in time for elimination... __________________ If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis

12-20-2009, 08:46 PM	#8
glatt ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 27,717	My plan of making Tony feel secure is working perfectly. He probably thinks he's going to win. But Jacobs hasn't played yet. This is going to be one to tell the grandchildren.

12-20-2009, 09:16 PM	#9
Griff still says videotape Join Date: Feb 2001 Posts: 26,813	Okay you put him to sleep, time to drop the hammer. __________________ If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)