Global warming?

[tw]

Originally Posted by SamIam

I don’t know where your graph came from.

It's typical of graphs edited by a political agenda. Another example of what happens when White House lawyers rewrite the science.

Actual Vostok graphs demonstrate a scary problem. Jinx picture conveniently eliminates the last 100 years. That citation shows the usual and lesser changes that occur over thousands of years - some directly traceable to extraordinary events. But nothing in earth's 400,000 year history has seen temperatures rise this high AND this fast.

Eliminate political agendas and the junk science reasoning; then science overwhelmingly acknowledges this global warming problem. We know man has seriously changed the climate. Question is how much and how much must change to avert this problem. The trend is well established. All that remains is refining the numbers. Earth has never seen temperatures this high. Earth has never seen temperatures increase this quickly in a hundred years. See the chart that was not edited by political agendas. Notice how the jinx chart forgot to include the last 100 years to manipulate a conclusion.

[jinx]

Yeah wikipedia is practicallly Fox News...

sorry, though I had the link in up there, forgot the graph on that page was too big.




Homer: Oh Lisa, there's no record of a hurricane ever hitting Springfield.
Lisa: Yes, but the records only go back to 1978 when the hall of records was mysteriously blown away.

[spudcon]

Originally Posted by tw

It's typical of graphs edited by a political agenda. Another example of what happens when White House lawyers rewrite the science.

Actual Vostok graphs demonstrate a scary problem. Jinx picture conveniently eliminates the last 100 years.

And TW's graph conveniently eliminates the last 9 years.