Impeding changes to our Health Care system

[classicman]

Link works for me. I noticed that MSNBC got that wrong initially and it wasn't corrected by salon either. Guess thats the excellence in our media shining through . . . again.

[Shawnee123]

Originally Posted by classicman

Link works for me. I noticed that MSNBC got that wrong initially and it wasn't corrected by salon either. Guess thats the excellence in our media shining through . . . again.

No, the link worked, I just find such a glaring error in the first sentence to be a big fail as far as making me say "egads! Say it isn't so!"

I am unable to find a corresponding MSNBC article.

[classicman]

Originally Posted by Shawnee123

I am unable to find a corresponding MSNBC article.

Thats because it wasn't in an article, it was on live TV - Keith Olbermans show.

[classicman]

Originally Posted by Shawnee123

Keith Olberman's show incorrectly introduced him as a Democrat from Rhode Island? Link?

Originally Posted by classicman

it wasn't in an article, it was on live TV - Keith Olbermans show.

I have no link - I saw it. Sheesh.

[classicman]

Originally Posted by Shawnee123

tw sure is right about you sometimes...
I point out a glaring error. You dance and skate and can't concede your Chicken Little tendencies.
Just admit it was a bad point?

I watched the show personally, I saw it. But that wasn't the main point of posting the artivle. His opinions were. Whether he was from Ohio , Rhode Island or East Jabip, is inconsequential. If it makes it easier to discuss what he actually said instead of that, fine. I must have what I saw.

Originally Posted by Redux

Classic will find small issues to nitpick, as long as it is critical of the Democrats...then duck and weave when called out on the facts or the lack of context in their endless links.
Or they will just call you a partisan.

Sorry pal - thats not my game. Aside from you being admittedly partisan. You, however, have been doing it more and more lately though. (Look in a mirror) And please stop grouping people together. Take each of us on our own for what we each say and do.
I found an article with information I thought of value and posted it for discussion. Both you and Shaw have glossed over the point of the article and tried to, how did you put it "duck and weave." Instead of discussing what the content was, you focus on a totally insignificant point.

Its easy to nitpick the health care reform. The process and the results have been far from perfect.

We certainly agree upon that.

And the results, when enacted, are that 30+ million of those currently uninsured will have access to affordable health care.
and by most objective analyses, they wont see their health care costs continue to rise at unmanageable rates.

I disagree wholeheartedly with respect to the costs and history will bear me out as being correct. There is not one Gov't program of this significance that didn't cost infinitely more than proposed and deliver far less. The numbers are and will be manipulated and shown in the best light possible for the benefit of whomever is making their point.