The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Home Base
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Home Base A starting point, and place for threads don't seem to belong anywhere else

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2010, 05:38 PM   #1
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
So what is the goal of the sanctuary in Pennsylvania for those wolves ?
Just the fact that this facility even exists would drive some Oregon hunters nuts.

Wolves are being released into the wild in Montana and Idaho,
and are slowly making their way into eastern and central Oregon.
They are no longer on the federal endangered/protected (?) lists,
but Oregon law still has them on the State's protected list.

Oregon's Dept of Fish and Wildlife has set up a program
maximum of 2 breeding pairs in each of 8 areas of the state,
and hunters are acting as if there's a wolf behind every tree.
Hunters are concerned over the loss of deer and elk, which are
actually decreasing in substantial numbers. (any number of causes)

Another predator of concern to hunters is the cougar/mountain lion
which is increasing in numbers, probably because they can no longer
be hunted with hounds in Oregon (as result of a state-wide public
referendum about 6 years ago).
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 11:30 PM   #2
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lamplighter View Post
So what is the goal of the sanctuary in Pennsylvania for those wolves ?
The founder was smoking crack and thought it would be a good idea to do a real Wolfen.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 11:41 PM   #3
jinx
Come on, cat.
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: general vicinity of Philadelphia area
Posts: 7,013
Presence Of Wolves Allows Aspen Recovery In Yellowstone


Quote:
The wolves are back, and for the first time in more than 50 years, young aspen trees are growing again in the northern range of Yellowstone National Park.

After an absence of 70 years, wolves were re-introduced to Yellowstone Park in 1995, and elk populations began a steady decline, cut in half over the past decade. Also, the presence of a natural predator appears to have altered the behavior of the remaining elk, which in their fear of wolves tend to avoid browsing in certain areas where they feel most vulnerable. The two factors together have caused a significant reduction in elk browsing on young aspen shoots, allowing them to survive to heights where some are now above the animal browsing level.
__________________
Crying won't help you, praying won't do you no good.
jinx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 08:35 AM   #4
glatt
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
Very interesting. It's obvious that putting the wolves in will impact the elk, but I had no idea about the trees. I wonder if anyone did?
glatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 11:04 AM   #5
classicman
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
Very interesting. It's obvious that putting the wolves in will impact the elk, but I had no idea about the trees. I wonder if anyone did?
I doubt anyone thought that far into it, but who knows. I do think that this is a great example of the unintended consequences of humans actions on the environment. In this case it seems like they were positive ... so far.




No when we realize what having too many aspen trees and them being to tall and blocking the light from some other something and then when they don't reproduce .... headspinning.
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt
classicman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 06:56 AM   #6
Griff
still says videotape
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
Quote:
Originally Posted by glatt View Post
Very interesting. It's obvious that putting the wolves in will impact the elk, but I had no idea about the trees. I wonder if anyone did?
They probably did. Around here the whitetail population is destroying the forest undergrowth. The Gamelands next door has a deer exclusion fence in one area so biologists can study a deer free area. A large property owner nearby has an exclusion fence to support forest recovery, creating a reserve for native plants.
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Griff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 09:44 AM   #7
xoxoxoBruce
The future is unwritten
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
There's always somebody thinking about this stuff, it's a matter of the people thinking/knowing, having influence with the people that have the power to effect changes.

I remember when they were planning strip mine reclamation, they decided Elk would be better than Deer, because of different eating habits. Elk graze and Deer browse.
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.
xoxoxoBruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 09:57 PM   #8
Lamplighter
Person who doesn't update the user title
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
For those of you following the "wolf story"

This animal is demonstrating Americans in all their glory:
State officials bucking federal law,
Hunters protecting their favorite game animals,
Businesses seeking governmental protection against natural risks,
and Environmentalists using the courts to their advantage.

Idaho seeks to kill hundreds of protected wolves
By Laura Zuckerman
SALMON | Fri Aug 6, 2010 5:50pm EDT

Quote:
SALMON Idaho (Reuters) - Idaho game officials said on Friday they would seek federal approval to kill off hundreds of wolves in their state despite a court ruling that restored protection of the animals under the Endangered Species Act.
Quote:
Montana, the second of two states where the gray wolf was ordered returned to the federal endangered species list, is likely to follow Idaho's lead in seeking permission to thin its wolf packs through licensed sport hunting or government squads of aerial gunners.
Quote:
Powerful ranching interests in both states opposed reintroduction of wolves to the region 15 years ago and have continued to resist federal protection of the animals as a threat to livestock. Sportsmen complain wolves are killing too many big-game animals, like elk, that could be hunted instead.
Quote:
At last count, in December 2009, the gray wolf population in the Northern Rockies,
including Yellowstone National Park and the surrounding region, was estimated at 1,700 animals.
Environmentalists say the region's wolf population would have to reach
between 2,000 and 3,000 individuals in order to be considered viable by international standards.
Lamplighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.