The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2010, 06:03 PM   #1
ZenGum
Doctor Wtf
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Badelaide, Baustralia
Posts: 12,861
In Parliament of Whores, P.J O'Rourke described the situation with social security. He's more than half satirical, but I think he has these facts, at least, correct.

Soc Sec takes some money in, pays some money out. If there is surplus (which there has usually been ... up until now) the only "investment" they are allowed to make is to buy US treasury bonds. A brief reflection on the insane gambles of the Savings and Loans crisis will make clear why no one trust bureaucrats with money.

Problem is, when they lend money to the treasury, the only thing the treasury can do is spend it. They're not allowed to invest it either.

Then in the future (which is now here), when soc sec runs into the red, they call up the feds and say, pay some back please. The feds can only shrug, say "we've spent it" and either raise taxes on everyone else, or cut or delay soc sec payments.

US style social security seems to be either disguised and poorly managed taxation, or a giant ponzi scheme.

Is this how it looks to you guys?
__________________
Shut up and hug. MoreThanPretty, Nov 5, 2008.
Just because I'm nominally polite, does not make me a pussy. Sundae Girl.
ZenGum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 05:17 PM   #2
Happy Monkey
I think this line's mostly filler.
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 13,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZenGum View Post
Then in the future (which is now here), when soc sec runs into the red, they call up the feds and say, pay some back please. The feds can only shrug, say "we've spent it" and either raise taxes on everyone else, or cut or delay soc sec payments.
...
Is this how it looks to you guys?
Social security is just another purchaser of Treasury bonds. They will get paid back. They are projected to run out of bonds in 27 years, and even then they're projected to be able to cover 80% of their obligations out of year-by-year income. Social Security is fine, for the forseeable future (which is less than 27 years). It would be OK to do some of Orszag's tweaks, to fill in that last 20%, but that will not help the deficit appreciably. And I see no need to do much with Social Security until the bonds run out, as they were only intended to be a temporary stopgap for the Boomers. Once they run out, it should go back to paying year by year, using tweaks like those described.
__________________
_________________
|...............| We live in the nick of times.
| Len 17, Wid 3 |
|_______________| [pics]
Happy Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.