![]() |
|
|||||||
| Current Events Help understand the world by talking about things happening in it |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Operations Operative
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
|
Well, only if Republican lawmakers would base public policy decisions on what might be best for the children rather than invoking or attempting to impose their religious beliefs on the broader public (add) or slash and burn budget cutting.
Or maybe you think proposing to cut the WIC (women, infant, children) supplemental food program by nearly $1 billion will not impact the lives of hundreds of thousands of children. Last edited by Fair&Balanced; 06-15-2011 at 09:20 AM. Reason: clarification |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Makes some feel uncomfortable
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,346
|
Or deciding that it's more important to line the pockets of the already rich than for a young couple to feel that they can earn enough to support two children.
__________________
"I'm certainly free, nay compelled, to spread the gospel of Spex. " - xoxoxoBruce
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Operations Operative
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 495
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|