The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-14-2011, 05:38 PM   #11
DanaC
We have to go back, Kate!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMercenary View Post
And that right there is Wealth Envy...
How is that wealth envy? You don't see the hypocrisy in the characterisation of the amount of money that could be got from taxing the rich as neglible and therefore not worth pursuing as it wouldn;t make a difference, whilst the same or smaller amount of money that could be saved by cutting off the services and benefits of the lower incomes is characterised as a worthwhile figure which must be pursued, because it would make a real difference?

Setting aside the rights and wrongs of taxation -v- spending cuts, it's the characterisation of the amount as too low to bother with, or too great to not bother with that I'm talking about.

There are much better arguments against taxing the rich than that it wouldn't be enough to make a difference.
__________________
Quote:
There's only so much punishment a man can take in pursuit of punani. - Sundae
http://sites.google.com/site/danispoetry/
DanaC is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.