Should the US have a third party?

henry quirk · 12-02-2011, 08:46 AM

Good.

Gum up the works...slow that train down (even more).

Effective, efficient, government is a chain (leash) around a citizen's neck.

If the 'governors' insist on being 'full-time' then let them war with one another most of the time and leave you and me and him and her 'alone'.

Spexxvet · 12-02-2011, 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by henry quirk

Good.

Gum up the works...slow that train down (even more).

Yeah, because if we need some decisive, urgent action, we'll be screwed.

henry quirk · 12-02-2011, 09:35 AM

"we'll be screwed"

'We' already is.

#

"decisive, urgent action"

An example would be nice.

View Poll Results: Does the US need a third party?
Yes, anything is better than the two we have now	6	33.33%
No, the Democrats and Republicans were good enough for grandpa, and they're good enough for me	0	0%
Nice thought, but impossible to implement for a variety of reasons	7	38.89%
No, what we need is a revolution	3	16.67%
Huh? Who me? I dunno	2	11.11%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

12-02-2011, 08:46 AM	#1
henry quirk maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 2,162	"As a team it would be disfunctional" Good. Gum up the works...slow that train down (even more). Effective, efficient, government is a chain (leash) around a citizen's neck. If the 'governors' insist on being 'full-time' then let them war with one another most of the time and leave you and me and him and her 'alone'. __________________ like the other guy sez: 'not really back, blah-blah-blah...'

12-02-2011, 09:35 AM	#3
henry quirk maskless: yesterday, today, tomorrow Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 2,162	"we'll be screwed" 'We' already is. # "decisive, urgent action" An example would be nice. __________________ like the other guy sez: 'not really back, blah-blah-blah...' Last edited by henry quirk; 12-02-2011 at 09:43 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)