The Love that Dare Not Squeak its Name

Beestie · 02-10-2004, 12:47 PM

Ultimately, even if the argument the author is advancing is "tit for tat" (maybe there are homosexual animals; who knows what their feeling despite our (possibly) self-serving interpretation of their behavior) I think he does a disservice to his own point by using an argument designed to convince only those people who don't realize that their own counterargument is equally flawed.

And since that appears to be the sole purpose of the article, I think it would have been better not to have written it.

Just my $02.

02-10-2004, 12:47 PM	#8
Beestie -◊\|≡·∙■·∙≡\|◊- Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Parts unknown. Posts: 4,081	Ultimately, even if the argument the author is advancing is "tit for tat" (maybe there are homosexual animals; who knows what their feeling despite our (possibly) self-serving interpretation of their behavior) I think he does a disservice to his own point by using an argument designed to convince only those people who don't realize that their own counterargument is equally flawed. And since that appears to be the sole purpose of the article, I think it would have been better not to have written it. Just my $02. __________________ ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)