![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
Yes, Cheney also used that reasoning. Justified by 'findings' that said even torture was good and acceptable. Unfortunately, many Americans also agreed, without doubt, with Cheney. What has changed? Our extremists in government are greater in numbers, power, and gall. Back during Watergate, this 'Imperial Presidency' is why Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren demanded a unanimous vote against Nixon. He worried that even an 8-1 vote would encourage the military to move against the court on orders from Nixon. Many forget back then how much concern existed for overt challenges to Constitutional law. "Imperial Presidency' was part of a larger fear. The Supreme Court had to consider even (least likely) alternatives such as a military occupation of the Supreme Court. Because Nixon's "Imperial Presidency" said a president's 'findings' were automatic laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
barely disguised asshole, keeper of all that is holy.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,401
|
Quote:
expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power dramatically. Warren retired in '69 long before Watergate. In fact he passed away a month before Nixon "resigned." Warren had nothing to do with "demanding anything relative to Nixon and Watergate. The only unanimous decisions he demanded were regarding segregation. His comments on watergate ... Quote:
__________________
"like strapping a pillow on a bull in a china shop" Bullitt |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|