Swords don't kill people

Clodfobble · 01-21-2013, 09:51 PM

Only if you assume they're missing one whole leg. I propose that in the case of partial limbs, it is, in fact, "less" leg.

ZenGum · 01-21-2013, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clodfobble

Only if you assume they're missing one whole leg. I propose that in the case of partial limbs, it is, in fact, "less" leg.

... but as soon as you put the "s" on "legs" you're treating it as countable.
1.8 legs is fewer than 2.0 legs.

01-21-2013, 09:51 PM	#1
Clodfobble UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 20,012	Only if you assume they're missing one whole leg. I propose that in the case of partial limbs, it is, in fact, "less" leg. __________________ My book My other book My spirit animal

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)