![]() |
|
Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Snowflake
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dystopia
Posts: 13,136
|
Omni.
Oh wait, Scientific American.
__________________
****************** There's a level of facility that everyone needs to accomplish, and from there it's a matter of deciding for yourself how important ultra-facility is to your expression. ... I found, like Joseph Campbell said, if you just follow whatever gives you a little joy or excitement or awe, then you're on the right track. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terry Bozzio |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Omni! I forgot all about that one. I actually bought an issue once, I think. I had one in my possession anyway.
I remember an article saying that scientists were working on the idea that men could get pregnant if you implanted an embryo next to their small intestine. The embryo would get enough nutrients through the intestinal wall to let the baby grow, and then they could deliver by Cesarian when the baby matured. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Adapt and Survive
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ann Arbor, Mi
Posts: 957
|
I finally got to look at Scientific American, I see it's a more 'scholarly' work a lot of two page articles with a single title picture.
Popoular Science is more 'pop' more graphics and short articles, alot of adverts too, guess that helps keep the price down ![]() Although I get the impression there is more science in Scientific American, it depends which one will get more read. Probably going to go Pop Science. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|