The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2004, 12:17 PM   #1
godwulf
Coronation Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 96
Quote:
To admit the need for such justification is to assume that there is some rule which killing animals for food appears to break
The taking of a conscious animal life is not automatically or by default a morality-neutral action, simply because someone who wants to do it chooses not to want to think about it.

On one side of the equation are the indisuputable facts that an animal feels pain when shot, and that the animal wants to live; unless you've got a reason to consider those things to be relatively unimportant - or which, in other words, overrides the facts noted - then I would think that the rule of common decency, if nothing else, is something you might want to consider.
godwulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.