![]() |
|
Technology Computing, programming, science, electronics, telecommunications, etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Quote:
Back to a new machine, how big does a SSD need to be to get the speed performance? I'd still store all my jpegs and stuff on another drive. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Esnohplad Semaj Ton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: A little south of sanity
Posts: 2,259
|
Quote:
ETA: As long as your OS and other IO intensive tasks can fit. I'm not sure if XP has gotten updates to optimize read/writes on SSDs. I'd bet you'd see some improvement regardless. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Esnohplad Semaj Ton
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: A little south of sanity
Posts: 2,259
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Read? I only know how to write.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,933
|
Quote:
SSD means reading the program/data from the disk is faster. And then the system takes the same time to still process and display that information. How much faster is a machine when the DRAM memory is doubled? Another indication of what (of so many) bottleneck exists. Waiting for the disk drive to load a program is often only a tiny part of the waiting time. Those other bottlenecks are not solved by an SSD. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|