![]() |
|
|||||||
| Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
still says videotape
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,813
|
I like that graph. It really cuts to the bones of the spending vs revenue problem. It shows that we maybe were dead wrong in the eighties and should check out some pie charts from that time vs now for comparison. Big defense is big government...
__________________
If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis D. Brandeis |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Amen Griff.
To hear today's GOP, Reagan was the master of an astute economic theory. Wiki: Quote:
We are still living with his "star wars" (Strategic Defense Initiative), and to some extent his 600-ship Navy, with their resulting and ever-increasing (supply-side) deficits -> debt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
My only gripe about it is that I don't have a good understanding of what percent of GDP really means. I would more easily understand percent of annual budget, or dollars adjusted for inflation. I'm not sure percent of GDP is a good measure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Glatt, "deficit" is for a particular period of time, whereas "debt" is the cumulated deficits
So I look on GDP as the total output of energy and resources ($) of the country. So, looking at a given year's deficit as a %GDP is a measure of what the country would have to expend to reduce that deficit (to zero). OTOH, higher inflation has the effect in future years of reducing the subsequent debt-to-%GDP ratios ... i.e., older debts can be paid off with "cheaper" dollars BUT, I'm open to being educated out of the error of my ways. . |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
™
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 27,717
|
Quote:
But I'm no economist. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Truckers are trying to organize a strike and occupy DC this weekend.
The first come-on is to protest the government shutdown. But then if you drill down one step, it is to protest "government corruption" And then if you drill down further, it becomes a far right-wing jumble. Some trucker groups are backing away, some large outfits are too. So if you plan to be in DC this weekend, don't be surprised by some big-rig traffic jams. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Person who doesn't update the user title
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bottom lands of the Missoula floods
Posts: 6,402
|
Quote:
Fox News 10/11/13 Dozens, not thousands, show up for DC trucker protest Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hoodoo Guru
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 286
|
Quote:
A crude example: spending $100 a month on a cell phone with a good data plan is a big deal if you're 16 and work part-time at McDonalds; if you're an investment banker pulling in 6 figures a year, it's a fairly minor expense. You can represent this in general by looking at an expenditure as a percentage of annual income. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|