![]() |
|
Cellar Meta Users, threads, etiquette, posting, usage, forums, why this place matters or doesn't |
View Poll Results: How would you rate this thread? | |||
Awesome |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 14.29% |
Excellent |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
OK |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 14.29% |
Bad |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Horrible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 71.43% |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#5 |
retired
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,930
|
The reason for suggesting that a member be able to "rate" the thread multiple times is valid, I think, because the thread changes with each post.
A well conceived initial post can deteriorate into drivel. A mediocre threat might take on a new vibrant life. I don't mind that you don't agree with me, at this time. Perhaps you might change your evaluation of even this thread when others add different ideas that you might like a lot more than mine. ![]() Should you then have an opportunity to re-evaluate, or should you be stuck with your orignial assessment of a completely different series of posts? As far as a rating system, with nothing happening as a result, what is the point of voting if it doesn't change the status quo? Members will only vote if their votes effect change, one way or the other. Last edited by Nic Name; 01-15-2002 at 09:20 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|