The Cellar  

Go Back   The Cellar > Main > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Politics Where we learn not to think less of others who don't share our views

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-20-2015, 09:15 AM   #2
Clodfobble
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
You're absolutely right, Sundae. Her train of thought seems to be, "Some of these girls have smallish tits, therefore I am really rocking the boat on standards of beauty!"

But even beyond that, to insist "ugly is beautiful" is to miss the point. How about we judge on non-physical-appearance standards altogether? We should work on making "compelling," and "captivating," and "inspiring," and "brilliant" the compliments of the day, rather than trying to redefine something that is evolutionarily bred into us.

Symmetrical faces are beautiful. Mathematically ideal waist-to-hip ratios are beautiful. The first person we fucked is, on some level in our animal brains, permanently beautiful. Those things will never change. Beautiful is nice, but it's not worth elevating by defiance.
Clodfobble is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.