Weird News

glatt · 02-22-2016, 11:37 AM

It's 180x120 pixels (pretty small)

fargon · 02-22-2016, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glatt

It's 180x120 pixels (pretty small)

What pic are we talking about?

Gravdigr · 02-22-2016, 12:29 PM

I see an 800 x 532 image.

I'm talking about this one.

glatt · 02-22-2016, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravdigr

I see an 800 x 532 image.

I'm talking about this one.

That's the one. Post 3454.

I wonder why that third party site serves up different sizes to different people?
I'm running Firefox.

glatt · 02-22-2016, 01:42 PM

Chrome and IE also serve it up at that small size for me.

That is weird news.

Carruthers · 02-22-2016, 01:57 PM

It's all a bit puzzling.

I uploaded the image at 800x600 as the recommended size for a 15" monitor.
It's a reasonable size for most monitors and is unlikely to fall over the edges of a tablet.
It measures 800x532, but that's neither here nor there.
That displays as approx 8.5" x 6" on this monitor.

I tend to use an image hosting site rather than run up against file size limitations for attachments on the Cellar.
Also, I have a feeling that there might be a limit to the number of attachments permitted.

BTW, I'm using Firefox, and IE displays also displays it perfectly.

glatt · 02-22-2016, 02:17 PM

I personally prefer attachments because 3rd party sites will stop hosting the pictures eventually as they go out of business, and then the threads are left incomplete. The Cellar abides.

02-22-2016, 12:29 PM	#3
Gravdigr The Un-Tuckian Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: South Central...KY that is Posts: 39,517	I see an 800 x 532 image. I'm talking about this one. __________________ These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA, EPA, FBI, DEA, CDC, or FDIC. These statements are not intended to diagnose, cause, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. If you feel you have been harmed/offended by, or, disagree with any of the above statements or images, please feel free to fuck right off.

02-22-2016, 01:57 PM	#6
Carruthers Junior Master Dwellar Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Buckinghamshire UK Posts: 4,059	It's all a bit puzzling. I uploaded the image at 800x600 as the recommended size for a 15" monitor. It's a reasonable size for most monitors and is unlikely to fall over the edges of a tablet. It measures 800x532, but that's neither here nor there. That displays as approx 8.5" x 6" on this monitor. I tend to use an image hosting site rather than run up against file size limitations for attachments on the Cellar. Also, I have a feeling that there might be a limit to the number of attachments permitted. BTW, I'm using Firefox, and IE displays also displays it perfectly. __________________

02-22-2016, 11:37 AM	#1
glatt ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 27,717	It's 180x120 pixels (pretty small)

02-22-2016, 01:42 PM	#5
glatt ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 27,717	Chrome and IE also serve it up at that small size for me. That is weird news.

02-22-2016, 02:17 PM	#7
glatt ™ Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Arlington, VA Posts: 27,717	I personally prefer attachments because 3rd party sites will stop hosting the pictures eventually as they go out of business, and then the threads are left incomplete. The Cellar abides.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)