Are Photographs Art

xoxoxoBruce · 05-03-2016, 01:00 PM

It took an awful lot of money or an awful lot of pull, maybe both. to shoot this series. Looking at these two, and more of his work, embiggened, lightened, etc, I keep finding details that may or may not been intentional, maybe part of the interpretation or just static. It's hard to figure out the plot when I can't tell the actors from the scenery. At least with a painting, if it's there it's supposed to be.
Yes, needs a interpretation center. Hopefully whoever paid $33 grand for the first OP picture, got an explanation or brochure.

05-03-2016, 01:00 PM	#7
xoxoxoBruce The future is unwritten Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 71,105	It took an awful lot of money or an awful lot of pull, maybe both. to shoot this series. Looking at these two, and more of his work, embiggened, lightened, etc, I keep finding details that may or may not been intentional, maybe part of the interpretation or just static. It's hard to figure out the plot when I can't tell the actors from the scenery. At least with a painting, if it's there it's supposed to be. Yes, needs a interpretation center. Hopefully whoever paid $33 grand for the first OP picture, got an explanation or brochure. __________________ The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)