![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
Speaking of Madam Antoinette, I just learned an interesting thing about the whole "Let them eat cake" story.
This historian was arguing that "cake" did not mean pastry as we think of it, but what was colloquially referred to as cake back then, which was the clumpy black shit that poor people cleaned out of chimneys. (This is where we get the phase about something being "really caked on" a surface.) So it wasn't in fact a case of a clueless aristocrat who had no idea what it's like to be without money, as people tend to interpret the story today, but rather a cruel and uncaring aristocrat who thought the poor's suffering deserved a good pun. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
To shreds, you say?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: in the house and on the street-how many, many feet we meet!
Posts: 18,449
|
fobble, I am disappoint.
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cake that points to a similar statement made by a 3rd century Chinese emperor. I'm hungry.
__________________
The internet is a hateful stew of vomit you can never take completely seriously. - Her Fobs |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
The future is unwritten
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 71,105
|
Meh, better than yellowcake.
![]()
__________________
The descent of man ~ Nixon, Friedman, Reagan, Trump. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
UNDER CONDITIONAL MITIGATION
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,012
|
And way better than urinal cake.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
We have to go back, Kate!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 25,964
|
Nowhere near as nice as Pontefract cake though*
* I like them now. I was dismayed by them as a child.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Encrypted Into an AmpitheaterWall
Posts: 1,722
|
why call saul??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|