|
Philosophy Religions, schools of thought, matters of importance and navel-gazing |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-16-2009, 06:26 AM | #11 |
you ask me
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 56
|
I can't pretend to be a student of Singer, or philosophy for that matter. I've read vanishingly small quantities of both.
But I'm interested in what Singer has to say about 'expanding circles' of empathy. As an ethologist, I'm interested in the roots of empathy in our biology, as described by primatologist Frans deWaal. Like Singer, I'm a hard consequentialist, but I think empathy provides a subjectivity within which utilitarianism makes sense. It's not an abstract calculus, it's insight into the causes of harm and the nature of suffering. I think maybe the three big ideas in philosophical ethics -virtue, duty and the greater good- probably reflect three modes of the operation of empathy -subjective, collective and universal. smoothmoniker's comments about children younger than 2 and the mentally handicapped made me think of the Stephen Hawking would have been left to die argument against Obama's health reforms. Lol! And I never really got metaphysics. Is that like angels on pinheads and stuff? Last edited by sean; 09-16-2009 at 06:37 AM. Reason: ... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|