Pay for Work Completed

smoothmoniker · 07-28-2004, 01:27 PM

it's an issue of perponderance of the evidence. If you have e-contracts, that's one step above verbal "he said/she said". If he has inked contracts that contradict you, that's one step higher on the evidence latter.

e-contracts aren't inadmissible, they're just weak against stronger arguments. In small claims courts, they don't necessarily expect a 200 page notarized legal document ... they get alot of cases where it's just some guys printed invoice, or scribbling on a napkin.

-sm

07-28-2004, 01:27 PM	#13
smoothmoniker to live and die in LA Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 2,090	it's an issue of perponderance of the evidence. If you have e-contracts, that's one step above verbal "he said/she said". If he has inked contracts that contradict you, that's one step higher on the evidence latter. e-contracts aren't inadmissible, they're just weak against stronger arguments. In small claims courts, they don't necessarily expect a 200 page notarized legal document ... they get alot of cases where it's just some guys printed invoice, or scribbling on a napkin. -sm __________________ to live and die in LA

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)