Quote:
Originally Posted by lookout123
Would you care to address that or do you want to educate us on the 70 hp/L engine for awhile?
|
So you want this to be about your intelligence. I have no problem discussing you and UG as the same intellectual micro-brains. You make it so easy.
You can stop being a scumbag now because numbers such as the 70 Hp/l engine were too complicated for you. Best you stop the cheapshot and deal with facts as posted.
Ridiculous is a military where the world's largest Air Force is the US Air Force. And the world's second largest Air Force is the US Navy. At what point do our allies start contributing to world stability? We have no business being the world's only policeman. And that is exactly what the Project for a New American Century (and the George Jr administration) wants. After all, we must protect
'our' oil in Iraq.
Only those who love excessive military and who invent enemies need a military that massive. Only dying empires maintain a military that excessive.
The question is about where we waste our resources. Two perfectly ideal example are the US military and the paper dollar bill. Perfect examples because extremists do not want to address these major problems.
As DanaC said:
Quote:
The trouble is, as far as I can see, that as soon as you start trying to zero in on waste and unnecessary expenditure, vested interests in some service areas are so powerful that the spotlight just kind of glides over them ...
|
That problem exists only when Congress is dominated by extremists rather than pragmatists. When the political agenda is more important than the nation.